Now, Ward was playing in a superior team context and that's for sure. Ward's latest year looks particularly good but he played most of the year with the guy that won the Norris trophy so you'd kind of expect his "on-ice" stats to shine. Still, Ward put up two solid seasons in the top four in a row. In both years he led Boston defenders in defensive-offensive zone faceoffs and he wasn't ever getting the easiest competition so I think it's fair to say that Ward was taking on the tough minutes and doing well. The biggest downside is that he missed some time from injury in both seasons and as an older defenceman, his time for a serious decline is probably coming soon.
Morris, meanwhile, had one good season in Phoenix and one poor one. In 2007-08 Morris was taking on the tough minutes both in terms of quality of competition and in terms of defensive zone starts. Although he was mugged territorially (on a team with a ton of young forwards) he did get the puck moving in the right direction for the folks that hopped over the boards after him on many nights. The fact that his role changed so much the next year is a bit baffling. Morris played most of 2008-09 with Ed Jovanovski and, considering where they were starting, they got absolutely thrashed. In spite of starting way more often in the good end of the ice Morris posted terrible Corsi numbers in Phoenix (-164). The team itself was pretty poor (-458 Corsi before the deadline) but when you're on the ice taking the cherry ice time and getting bombed, you're a big part of what's going wrong. Given the offensive context of his ice time, the 0.61 pts/60 is very poor.
In all honesty, this seems like a pretty bad deal for the Bruins. They have moved out a guy that has played two solid seasons on a winning team for the privilege of taking a hit to the cap for three out of the next four years and gaining an extra $40,000 or so bucks for next year. And this was to make room for a guy that's (1) more expensive and (2) possibly not as good as Aaron Ward (also, Aaron Ward is an awesome guy). Now, I'm all for taking advantage of the fact that you can create cap space but if that was the main motivating factor here, it seems like overkill. This series of moves could end up working out for the Bruins, but the fact that they're paying an extra 1M to have Morris over Ward doesn't make sense to me from a cap management perspective. From a PR perspective, this could look pretty bad if Ward plays well in Carolina while Morris struggles in Boston.
2 comments:
Not sure why Boston didn't go after a guy like Dennis Seidenberg instead. I haven't looked too closely at his underlying stats, but he seemed to have a pretty solid year last year - better than Derek Morris anyways. He probably would have come cheaper too.
I think that Morris gets paid because of his reputation as a "puck-moving defenceman." At least, I remember him being called that in the past. If I was an agent I would be trying to get that rep for as many of my clients as possible.
I think the B's are banking on two years ago being the level Morris is capable of and the level he'll be performing at for next season. I can't imagine anyone thinking last year's performance was worth 3M+. In 2007-08 he did well taking the toughs in Phoenix and will probably look good if they play him with Chara in that role next season. Morris is probably excited for that opportunity (not to mention the potential payday next summer if he puts up good numbers).
Nonetheless, whether they went with Seidenberg or Morris or someone else, I don't really see why they traded away Ward. The change cost them an extra 1M against the cap and that looks pretty foolish to me.
Post a Comment