Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Avalanche v. Wild - Scoring Chances #33

TmPTimeNoteCOLOpponent
MIN119:11
4516313755512222732345v5
MIN118:00
9233139445236112532515v5
MIN116:48
45153140433691520325v5
COL115:50
1631374452551222273234365v5
COL115:22
915314452551222273234365v5
MIN114:06
8222526273159152032555v5
MIN114:05
8222526273159152032555v5
MIN114:04Goal8222526273159152032555v5
MIN19:40
922232731391125323436515v5
COL17:40
45153140432122323448
5v4
COL218:20
8222526273156142132485v5
MIN218:02
92331394452311253251555v5
COL214:41
459233139514213248555v5
COL21:28
45825263136122227325v5
MIN317:04
45153139431421323436485v5
COL314:04
4592331401421323436485v5
COL312:24
45916314059325155
5v4
COL39:05
9233140445236112532515v5
COL38:21
8232526273136212232
5v4
COL37:20
45916314036122532
5v4
MIN35:35
22253137395236112532515v5
COL30:25
5892325443691222325v5


#PlayerEVPPSH
4J. LILES16:57334:05300:1100
5B. CLARK15:15432:53301:3500
8W. WOLSKI11:50335:49100:4200
9M. DUCHENE12:04534:24200:3300
15M. HENDRICKS8:22120:10100:2800
16D. TUCKER10:12113:13200:0000
22S. HANNAN15:18151:06002:5400
23M. HEJDUK9:47435:32100:4100
25C. STEWART10:57345:11100:0000
26P. STASTNY10:38235:32101:4000
27K. QUINCEY13:23145:42102:0600
31P. BUDAJ44:1471010:23404:4000
37R. O'REILLY14:39120:15001:4500
39T. GALIARDI9:32151:08002:2300
40M. SVATOS13:00214:09300:1800
43J. MERCIER7:22020:32100:0000
44R. WILSON15:14420:00000:1800
52A. FOOTE14:38331:11002:1600
55C. MCLEOD15:00211:03000:5000


PeriodTotalsEVPP5v3 PPSH5v3 SH
1372710000000
2313100000000
3623230000000
4000000000000
Totals121081040000000

The Wild certainly didn't do anything to help their reputation as a boring team in this game. Minnesota took the lead with about 54 minutes left in the game and from that point on there was a total of 12 chances. The Wild only had four of them and at one point went over twenty consecutive minutes without a scoring chance. Both teams were playing good defence and neither team was taking what the defence was giving them. Both teams tried to shoot the puck from poor angles in an attempt to generate rebounds but couldn't get people to the net to pick up the puck. Both teams tried to make passes to players in scoring areas but couldn't navigate through the sticks of their opponents. Both teams blocked quite a few shots. Both teams were poor on the power play, but the Avalanche especially so. 4 chances in 10 minutes is pretty poor and they just looked bad while doing it. The Wild were bad too, but two of their power play minutes involved Greg Zanon on the point as they were killing the clock in the last five minutes of the game. Their goals were a little different than usual. Not a very exciting game.

Except for Justin Mercier. It was his first NHL game, so I'm sure he was pretty excited. I was excited to see him in the lineup too because it meant David Koci was out! But, he didn't generate anything in his seven minutes of ice time and managed to be outchanced along with the rest of the fourth line. Not a particularly encouraging debut and his NCAA career doesn't exactly leave me pining for more. They'd likely be better off with Durno or Hensick.

The big officiating miss in the game was Martin Havlat lifting the net off its moorings and causing a stoppage in the second period just before the puck crossed into the Minnesota goal. I recall the Avalanche doing the exact same thing to Columbus a couple of games ago with the same result (tying goal disallowed). It seems like there's one of these kinds of things every game and must get frustrating for the players. I wonder how much these kinds of calls impact a team's record. It's probably significant.

But do you know what isn't significant? The first game back after a long road trip. This early in the season there isn't enough fatigue to cause a substantial change in performance and the psychological effect seems to be nil. The announcers were peddling this tripe throughout the first period much to my chagrin, even saying "It's been that way forever." Kids, when you hear a phrase like that about something that seems like it could be made-up it's probably worthwhile to check.

No comments: