Sunday, November 8, 2009

Avalanche v. Canucks - Scoring Chances #15

TmPTimeNoteCOLOpponent
COL117:08
101118284152524293055625v5
COL113:20
4511182841623242930625v5
COL19:38
11182227284138242930625v5
VAN18:58
8910234152617212326305v5
VAN18:57Goal8910234152617212326305v5
VAN18:30
8222326274138141830335v5
COL18:22
8222326274138141830335v5
COL16:03
459254154617212326305v5
VAN214:43
4511182841515303742555v5
VAN214:32
4511182841515303742555v5
VAN214:31
4511182841515303742555v5
VAN213:52
4511182841521303742555v5
VAN213:34Goal459182541617212326305v5
VAN211:54
482226404138143033375v5
VAN211:22
92223274154617212326305v5
COL210:50
102537414552515303742555v5
VAN29:49
4826274041514183033555v5
COL23:16
81011404152815303742555v5
COL20:25
91023415254617212326305v5
COL319:17
102337414552615233037425v5
VAN318:33
10222640415438141830335v5
VAN318:24
892223274138172126305v5
VAN317:12
2226273741
36141830334v5
VAN314:20
922273741
517212326304v5
VAN312:42
4511253741514183033555v5
VAN310:36Goal82226274041515303742555v5
COL310:07
102537414552524293055625v5
COL39:50
51125414552524263055625v5


#PlayerEVPPSH
4J. LILES15:38280:58000:0000
5B. CLARK14:00362:18001:2800
8W. WOLSKI13:16270:20000:0000
9M. DUCHENE14:09251:16001:1201
10K. CUMISKEY17:49630:28001:2500
11P. DUPUIS11:50550:01000:0000
18B. WILLSIE9:16350:00001:4500
22S. HANNAN17:19260:17003:4602
23M. HEJDUK17:35351:40000:2600
25C. STEWART12:48421:09000:0000
26P. STASTNY13:15151:40002:3301
27K. QUINCEY16:18251:43003:4602
28D. KOCI6:46340:00000:0000
37R. O'REILLY12:53311:11003:3402
40M. SVATOS10:34141:18000:0000
41C. ANDERSON50:3411152:52006:0002
45C. DURNO12:41400:00000:3200
52A. FOOTE20:17720:00001:3500
54D. JONES14:26220:01001:5800


PeriodTotalsEVPP5v3 PPSH5v3 SH
1535300000000
2383800000000
3363400000200
4000000000000
Totals1117111500000200

For the second game in a row the Avalanche did not have a good game by scoring chances. Although they started well in the first period they weren't able to generate any chances through the last two periods. On special teams, the penalty kill was very good but the power play looked awful. Joe Sacco called a timeout just prior to the Avalanche playing 0:35 of 5v3 in the first period and his team responded by generating absolutely nothing. No chances. No shots. I was deceived by John-Michael Liles early on, but no more! He really is just Marc-Andre Bergeron but worse at EV. In the big picture, the Avalanche have been outchanced badly over the last three games and they've only lost two of them, so they can't be too distraught with the results. The process, on the other hand, needs some work. After winning the chances battle for several games the last three games of this road trip have really seen their play regress.

Wojtek Wolski didn't get anything done in this game. He's been one of Colorado's more consistent players by scoring chances so far this year but tonight he just wasn't able to generate anything. That said, it's more than likely just an off game. Wolski is a great player.

There were two moments in this game that were particularly entertaining. The first was a comment by the Avalanche broadcast crew on the Canucks during the third period: "when they get the puck they're not just giving it back to the Avalanche and reverting back into their own zone." Now, this comment was bang on... except that as he was in the middle of making it the Canucks dumped the puck into the Avalanche zone and then pressed them with something closer to an 0-3-2 than a 1-2-2. I though it was funny. The other play was Ryan Kesler in clock-killing mode in the last five minutes of the third period (Kesler's a fanstastic player). Anyway, he'd been controlling the puck in the offensive zone with Adam Foote was working on him for about five or ten seconds. Then Kesler decided to break around the net. Foote didn't follow him. Kesler must have thought he was going to because he promptly leaned in with an arm out - as though there was another player with him - and biffed into the net. Hilarious.

At any rate, the Avalanche finally get some extended time at home over the next few weeks. It will be interesting to see whether (and more likely how much) their scoring chance rates improve.

No comments: